MUST READ:
Britain’s Hero Paul Kagame Re-embarks on plan to create Confusion in DR Congo to Facilitate Western Plunder: DR Congo army accuses Rwanda of deploying soldiers 'to defend M23': Rwanda says UK asylum seekers to arrive 'in next few weeks': UK asylum seekers hide to avoid transfer to Rwanda
https://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2022/06/britains-hero-paul-kagame-re-embarks-on.html
Western Neo-liberal banditry: There goes the Fracas Again: Congolese soldiers flee to Uganda as M23 rebels capture Bunagana border
https://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2022/06/western-neo-liberal-banditry-there-goes.htmlUK forced to cancel deportation flight to Rwanda after European court ruling
Issued on:
The number of those due to be put on the flight had dwindled from an original 130 to seven on Tuesday and finally none thanks to a last-minute ruling from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
British Home Secretary Priti Patel said she was disappointed that “legal challenge and last-minute claims” meant the plane did not take off but vowed to pursue the heavily criticised policy.
“We will not be deterred,” she said in a statement.
“Our legal team are reviewing every decision made on this flight and preparation for the next flight begins now.”
The grounding was thanks to an ECHR ruling that at least one of the asylum seekers should stay in Britain as there were no guarantees for his legal future in Rwanda.
Patel called the ECHR intervention “very surprising” and vowed that “many of those removed from this flight will be placed on the next”.
The flight cancellation is an embarrassment for Johnson’s Conservative government, after Foreign Secretary Liz Truss insisted the Kigali-bound plane would leave, no matter how many people were on board.
“There will be people on the flights and if they’re not on this flight, they will be on the next flight,” Truss told Sky News earlier Tuesday.
The ECHR issued an urgent interim measure to prevent the deportation of an Iraqi man booked on the flight as he may have been tortured and his asylum application was not completed.
The Strasbourg-based court said the expulsion should wait until British courts have taken a final decision on the legality of the policy, set for July.
British newspapers from across the political spectrum expressed outrage at the eleventh-hour reversal and the government’s handling of the affair.
The conservative Daily Mail and Daily Express placed the blame in the hands of “meddling judges in Strasbourg”, expressing anger at what they called the “abuse of the legal system”.
The left-leaning Daily Mirror, meanwhile, slammed the government’s “cruel farce” and the “chaos” the policy had provoked.
‘All wrong’
Rights group Care4Calais tweeted that the same measure could be applied to the others set to be transported to Rwanda.
Truss said the policy, which the UN refugee agency has criticised as “all wrong”, was vital to break up human-trafficking gangs exploiting vulnerable migrants.
Record numbers of migrants have made the perilous Channel crossing from northern France, heaping pressure on the government in London to act after it promised to tighten borders after Brexit.
British media said some 260 people attempting the crossing in small boats were brought ashore at the Channel port of Dover by 1200 GMT on Tuesday.
More than 10,000 have crossed since the start of the year.
‘Shames Britain’
Legal challenges in recent days had failed to stop the deportation policy, which the two top clerics in the Church of England and 23 bishops described as “immoral” and “shames Britain”.
“They (migrants) are the vulnerable that the Old Testament calls us to value,” Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby and Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell wrote in a letter to The Times.
“We cannot offer asylum to everyone, but we must not outsource our ethical responsibilities, or discard international law—which protects the right to claim asylum.”
It was reported last weekend that Queen Elizabeth II’s heir, Prince Charles, had privately described the government’s plan as “appalling”.
But Truss said: “The people who are immoral in this case are the people traffickers trading on human misery.”
In Kigali, government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo told reporters it was an “innovative programme” to tackle “a broken global asylum system”.
“We don’t think it is immoral to offer a home to people,” she told a news conference.
Johnson has told his senior ministers the policy was “the right thing to do”.
‘Value for money’
Truss said she could not put a figure on the cost of the charter flight, which has been estimated at upwards of £250,000 ($303,000).
But she insisted it was “value for money” to reduce the long-term cost of irregular migration, which the government says costs UK taxpayers £1.5 billion a year, including £5 million a day on accommodation.
In the Channel port of Calais, in northern France, migrants said the risk of deportation to Rwanda would not stop them trying to reach Britain.
Moussa, 21, from the Darfur region of Sudan, said “getting papers” was the attraction. “That’s why we want to go to England,” he said.
Deported asylum seekers who eventually make the 4,000-mile (6,500-kilometre) trip to Kigali will be put up in the Hope Hostel, which was built in 2014 to give refuge to orphans from the 1994 genocide of around 800,000 mainly ethnic Tutsis.
Hostel manager Ismael Bakina said up to 100 migrants can be accommodated at a rate of $65 per person a day and that “this is not a prison.”
The government in Kigali has rejected criticism that Rwanda is not a safe country and that serious human rights abuses were rife.
But Rwandan opposition parties have questioned whether the resettlement scheme will work given high youth unemployment rates.
Thousands in anti-Rwanda rally in eastern DR Congo city
Friction between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and its
eastern neighbour has surged in the past few weeks over the M23 rebel
group.
A primarily Congolese Tutsi militia that is one of scores of
armed groups in eastern DRC, the M23 leapt to global prominence in 2012
when it captured Goma.
It was forced out shortly afterwards in a joint offensive by UN troops and the Congolese army.
The
rebels resumed fighting last November after accusing the Kinshasa
government of failing to respect a 2009 agreement under which the army
was to incorporate its fighters.
Clashes intensified in March, causing thousands of people to flee, and on Monday the rebels took the trading town of Bunagana.
Rwanda denies the allegation of involvement. Both sides have accused each other of cross-border shelling.
Relations between Kinshasa and Kigali have been strained since the mass arrival in DRC of Rwandan Hutus accused of slaughtering Tutsis during the 1994 Rwanda genocide.
