
US threatens to cut aid to Uganda over new Anti-Homosexuality law
Written by URN
US President Joe Biden
 has threatened to cut aid totaling up to $1 billion per year after 
Uganda President Yoweri Museveni assented to the Anti-Homosexuality 
Bill, 2023. The new law calls for up to 20 years in prison for promoting
 homosexuality and life imprisonment for anyone convicted of 
homosexuality.
 
The law also imposes the death penalty 
for what it calls “aggravated homosexuality.” This includes having sex 
with people categorized as vulnerable, including the elderly and 
children.
Also, any 
Ugandan who does not report such cases is liable on conviction to spend 
five years in prison or pay a fine of Shs 10 million. Journalists and 
other media figures, on the other hand, face five years in prison if 
they disclose the identity of a victim of a homosexual act without the 
authority of the court or that person.
 
Below is Biden's full statement
The enactment of Uganda’s 
Anti-Homosexuality Act is a tragic violation of universal human 
rights—one that is not worthy of the Ugandan people, and one that 
jeopardizes the prospects of critical economic growth for the entire 
country.
I join with people around the 
world—including many in Uganda—in calling for its immediate repeal. No 
one should have to live in constant fear for their life or being 
subjected to violence and discrimination. It is wrong.
Since the Anti-Homosexuality Act was 
introduced, reports of violence and discrimination targeting Ugandans 
who are or are perceived to be LGBTQI+ are on the rise.
Innocent Ugandans now fear going to 
hospitals, clinics, or other establishments to receive life-saving 
medical care lest they be targeted by hateful reprisals. Some have been 
evicted from their homes or fired from their jobs.  And the prospect of 
graver threats—including lengthy prison sentences, violence, 
abuse—threatens any number of Ugandans who want nothing more than to 
live their lives in safety and freedom.
This shameful Act is the latest 
development in an alarming trend of human rights abuses and corruption 
in Uganda.  The dangers posed by this democratic backsliding are a 
threat to everyone residing in Uganda, including US government 
personnel, the staff of our implementing partners, tourists, members of 
the business community, and others.
As such, I have directed my National 
Security Council to evaluate the implications of this law on all aspects
 of U.S. engagement with Uganda, including our ability to safely deliver
 services under the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief 
(PEPFAR) and other forms of assistance and investments.
My Administration will also incorporate 
the impacts of the law into our review of Uganda’s eligibility for the 
African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).  And we are considering 
additional steps, including the application of sanctions and restriction
 of entry into the United States against anyone involved in serious 
human rights abuses or corruption.
The United States shares a deep and 
committed partnership with the people of Uganda.  For more than 60 
years, we have worked together to help millions of Ugandans live 
healthier, more productive lives.
Our programs have boosted economic 
growth and agricultural productivity, increased investments in Ugandan 
businesses, and strengthened our trade cooperation.  In total, the US 
Government invests nearly $1 billion annually in Uganda’s people, 
business, institutions, and military to advance our common agenda. 
The scale of our commitments speaks to 
the value we place on this partnership—and our faith in the people of 
Uganda to build for themselves a better future. It is my sincere hope 
that we can continue to build on this progress, together, and strengthen
 protections for the human rights of people everywhere.
 

Activists petition court to nullify newly signed anti-homosexuality law
Written by URN
A group of 11 activists has petitioned the Constitutional court challenging the new anti-homosexuality law just hours after it was signed by President Yoweri Museveni.
The petitioners
 include Prof Sylvia Tamale, Fox Odoi Oywelowo (West Budama County MP), 
Dr Busingye Kabumba, a lecturer of Law at Makerere University, Andrew 
Mwenda, the proprietor of the Independent News Magazine, Solome 
Nakaweesi Kimbugwe, a Pan Africanist feminist and activist and Dr Frank 
Mugisha, coordinator of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG).
Others 
are;  Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera, former executive director of Freedom 
and Roam Uganda (FARUG), Richard Smith Luthimbo, the executive director 
of Uganda Key Populations Consortium (UKPC), Eric Ndawula, a human 
rights activist and Williams Apako, the executive director of Tranz 
Network Uganda and Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HPRAF) 
headed by lawyer Adrian Jjuuko.
 The law imposes capital punishments on 
same-sex relations including life imprisonment and death sentence. The 
law which is largely targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and 
queer people also criminalizes the behaviour including having gay sex 
when HIV-positive, and stipulates a 20-year sentence for “promoting” 
homosexuality.      
In their petition filed yesterday Monday, 
the petitioners through their lawyers led by Dr Adrian Jjuuko said that 
they are challenging the new law for falling short of the required 
procedure by failing to include public voices and participation.
"The
 act was passed without adequate and meaningful public participation. 
When they are making laws, the public really has to be involved 
especially the people who are concerned. But we saw during the hearings 
of the committee and during when the discussions that not even a single 
LGBT person was basically before the committee to have their views heard
 and [yet] this is the law that affects them directly. We're also 
challenging the law because during the 2nd and 3rd readings on March 
21st and May 7th of 2023, the speaker's conduct clearly showed bias. The
 speaker clearly made statements that showed that she was in favour of 
passing this law and yet the speaker is supposed to be basically 
impartial when handling parliamentary sessions," said Jjuuko. 
They
 argue that the enactment of the Anti-homosexuality Act 2023 by the 11th
 parliament on May 2nd 2023 without meaningful and adequate public 
participation is unconstitutional and contrary to the national 
objectives and principles of state policy enshrined in the Constitution.
They
 further contend that by making it an offence for any person to allow or
 lease or sublease premises to be used for purposes of homosexuality or 
activities that encourage homosexuality is inconsistent and in 
contravention of the principle of legality. Further, they argue that 
criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual activity among adults in 
private contravenes the right to equality and non-discrimination, right 
to dignity, right to liberty, and the right to privacy.
The 
petitioners further contend that sections 11(1) and 2(b) of the 
Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 by criminalizing the publication, 
communication or distribution of any material that promotes or 
encourages homosexuality is in contravention of the principle of 
legality, freedoms of speech and expression, freedoms of thought, 
conscience and belief including academic freedom, the right to impart 
and access and receive information.
Also, that section 12 of the 
Anti-Homosexuality Act by prohibiting and disqualifying persons 
convicted of an offence of homosexuality from employment is in 
contravention of the right to practice one's profession or carry on 
lawful trade, right to equality and nondiscrimination.
The 
petitioners now want the entire act nullified for having been passed and
 enacted in breach of parliamentary procedure and in the alternative 
some of the sections complained of also declared null and avoid.
They
 are also seeking a permanent injunction restraining the attorney 
general who has been listed as the only respondent to the case and any 
of the government agents from implementing provisions of the act.
The
 attorney general is yet to be summoned to file his defense before this 
petition can be heard by the panel of five Constitutional court 
justices.
In 2014, the Constitutional court struck down the 
previous anti-homosexuality law on procedural grounds after finding that
 the parliament had passed it without the required quorum.
Prior 
to the nullification, some Western governments had suspended some aid, 
imposed visa restrictions and curtailed security cooperation with the 
Museveni-led government.
Museveni finally assents to Anti-Homosexuality Bill, 2023
https://observer.ug/news/headlines/77963-museveni-finally-assents-to-anti-homosexuality-bill-2023
Written by URN
 President, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has finally signed into law the Anti-Homosexuality Bill, 2023.
 
The Anti-Homosexuality Act, a highly 
contentious piece of legislation, has been a subject of intense 
discussion and lobbying both within and outside Uganda. Last month, 
Museveni returned the bill for review, especially in regard to clear 
definition between homosexuality and acts of homosexuality.
Museveni said it was wrong for the 
original bill to punish a homosexual or reformed homosexual who wasn't 
involved in the promotion or acts of homosexuality.
The new Act doesn't criminalise anyone 
who identifies as homosexual, but mandates life in prison for anyone who
 engages in homosexual acts, up to 20 years for promoting homosexuality,
 and a three-year sentence for children convicted of homosexuality while
 certain acts of gay sex could warrant the death penalty.
The speaker of parliament, Anita Among took to Twitter to express gratitude for the president's resolute action.
"I thank His Excellency, the president, for his steadfast action in the interest of Uganda," Among said. 
She
 noted that the parliament believes that the law safeguards the sanctity
 of the family, in accordance with Article 31 of the Ugandan 
Constitution. Additionally, she stated that the legislation aligns with 
the cultural values and aspirations of the Ugandan people, as outlined 
in objectives 19 and 24 of the national objectives and directive 
principles of state policy. 
She further commended the MPs for 
standing strong against external pressure and criticisms, attributing 
their resilience to the commitment to upholding Uganda's motto, "For God
 and our Country." 
“I now encourage the duty bearers under 
the law to execute the mandate bestowed upon them in the 
Anti-Homosexuality Act. The people of Uganda have spoken, and it is your
 duty to now enforce the law in a fair, steadfast, and firm manner,” she
 said. 
The enactment of the Anti-Homosexuality Act triggered 
widespread international reactions, with human rights organizations and 
advocacy groups expressing concern over its potential impact on the 
rights and freedoms of the LGBTQ+ community. The law has faced criticism
 for its potential to promote discrimination and persecution.
                                                                      
                              She noted that the parliament believes that the law safeguards the sanctity of the family, in accordance with Article 31 of the Ugandan Constitution. Additionally, she stated that the legislation aligns with the cultural values and aspirations of the Ugandan people, as outlined in objectives 19 and 24 of the national objectives and directive principles of state policy.
She further commended the MPs for standing strong against external pressure and criticisms, attributing their resilience to the commitment to upholding Uganda's motto, "For God and our Country."
The enactment of the Anti-Homosexuality Act triggered widespread international reactions, with human rights organizations and advocacy groups expressing concern over its potential impact on the rights and freedoms of the LGBTQ+ community. The law has faced criticism for its potential to promote discrimination and persecution.

