Also Read;
Wickedness in high places : When Ebola creators pretend to be messianic
solvers on their own biological weapon : WHO meets on experimental Ebola drug
use
http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2014/08/wickedness-in-high-places-when-ebola.html
The Ebola Outbreak: U.S.
Sponsored Bioterror?
Global Research, August 16, 2014
We can now be extraordinarily confident that the U.S. government
is lying, in key material respects, about the latest Ebola outbreak—and not
just because it lies about nearly everything of political consequence.
This article shows that there are compelling reasons to believe we are being
told three big lies about Ebola. It also offers a simple, rational, yet
disturbing, explanation that very tidily accounts for all three lies. The
explanation supposes that the current Ebola outbreak consists in an act of
U.S.-linked bioterror.
One key U.S. driven lie
has to do with the Western MSM’s insistence
that nobody of any repute believes that Ebola might be airborne. On this
issue, the Public Health Agency of Canada
remarks:
In the laboratory, infection through small-particle aerosols has been
demonstrated in primates, and airborne spread among humans is strongly
suspected, although it has not yet been conclusively demonstrated (1, 6, 13).
The importance of this route of transmission is not clear. Poor hygienic
conditions can aid the spread of the virus.
A few scientific studies expressing concern about the airborne possibility
are cited in this
article,
and other such studies are not hard to find.
So there are people with authority to speak to the issue who believe that
there is some cause for concern regarding the airborne Ebola prospect, but the U.S.
government/MSM complex instead lies and acts like this isn’t the case.
Before getting to the second U.S.
lie, it is important to mention three facts that have not received enough
discussion. First—and this may be of pivotal significance–we still have
no ideahow Ebolagot to West Africa.
See for yourself;
there’s never been an Ebola outbreak in West Africa
before.
Perhaps the racist U.S./MSM view is that all African countries are the same,
so who cares?
Second, the current outbreak, in terms of the number and international
breadth of infections, does seem to be far more contagious than any previous
outbreak; as the previous link shows, we now have at least 1,975 cases.
Now pause for a moment and take this fully on board: the 1,975 cases exceed
the total number of Ebola cases from 1977 to 2014’s outbreak. So it’s no
surprise that we have, for example,
signs
of infected individuals in Albania.
The second lie really is a lie of nondisclosure, and concerns the reality
that the MSM has not told us that we are dealing with a biologically distinct
form of Ebola that has never been seen before.
So, consider the following disconcerting information appearing in the
New England Journal
of Medicine in April 2014 regarding the current West African, Guinean
outbreak of Ebola:
Phylogenetic analysis of the full-length
sequences established a separate clade for the Guinean EBOV strain in sister
relationship with other known EBOV strains. This suggests that the EBOV strain
from Guinea has evolved in
parallel with the strains from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Gabon from a recent ancestor and has not been
introduced from the latter countries into Guinea. Potential reservoirs of
EBOV, fruit bats of the species
Hypsignathusmonstrosus, Epomopsfranqueti, & Myonycteristorquata, are
present in large parts of West Africa.
18 It
is possible that EBOV has circulated undetected in this region for some time.
The emergence of the virus in Guinea
highlights the risk of EBOV outbreaks in the whole West African subregion.
Furthermore, from the same study:
The high degree of similarity among the 15 partial L gene sequences, along
with the three full-length sequences and the epidemiologic links between the
cases, suggest a single introduction of the virus into the human population.
This introduction seems to have happened in early December 2013 or even
before.
So, the Guinean variant of Ebola we now confront has been found to be
sufficiently genetically distinct from all previous versions of Ebola that it
has been assigned its own genetic branch, or clade, and it is believed to have
evolved in parallel from an ancestor held in common with a variant of Ebola native
to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Gabon. Moreover, the current outbreak
began not in June or July, but as early as April 2014 and perhaps even earlier
than December, 2013.
And, we seem to have a single introduction of the Guinea (West African) Ebola variant
into the human population. Thus, we seem not to have, for example,
something along the lines of multiple bites of humans by supposedly Guinea
variant Ebola infected fruit bats.
Finally, the Western Africa Ebola outbreak does not appear to be traceable
to Central Africa or anywhere else, and so we still do not know how Ebola got
to West Africa.
Let us briefly summarize before presenting the third U.S. Ebola lie and
concluding with a reasonable explanation that ties the three lies together.
The Guinea Ebola variant has never been seen before. It might well be
far more contagious than any Ebola variant hitherto encountered; it could even
be airborne. We still have no idea how Ebola arose in West Africa, but it
did so some time ago—well before the Western MSM
started to spew its lies.
Now the third U.S. Ebola lie: In a Matt Drudge-linked article entitled “
The
Federal Government’s Inconsistent Ebola Story”, we find that the U.S.
government is telling two completely inconsistent stories regarding the
circumstances surrounding delivery of MappPharmaceuticals’ magic ZMapp Ebola
drug to Dr. Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol. Thus, we have:
According to the CDC, it was Samaritan’s Purse, the private humanitarian
organization that employs Dr. Brantley, who reached out to them in an attempt
to find an experimental Ebola drug. The CDC says it passed Samaritan’s Purse along
to NIH, who referred them to contacts within Mapp.
“This experimental treatment was arranged privately by Samaritan’s Purse,”
the CDC said. “Samaritan’s Purse contacted the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), who referred them to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
NIH was able to provide the organization with the appropriate contacts at the
private company developing this treatment. The NIH was not involved with
procuring, transporting, approving, or administering the experimental treatments.”
The New York Times first reported this version of events on Aug.
6, and the statement was posted on the CDC’s website a few days later,
where
it remains.
But, as the Morning Consult reports in the same article
,
we also have:
But the NIH told Morning Consult one of its scientists on the ground in West Africa approached the charity before the group had
even decided to pursue an experimental alternative.
“The NIH scientist who was in West Africa
referred Samaritan’s Purse to company contacts because they were best equipped
to answer questions about the status of their experimental treatment,” the
agency said in an email to Morning Consult. “This occurred before Samaritan’s
Purse decided to pursue an experimental therapy.”
A statement from Samaritan’s Purse also conflicts with the CDC’s telling of
events, and indicates the NIH and other government agencies may have played an
active role in procuring the drugs.
“The experimental medication given to Dr. Brantley was recommended to us,”
the group said. “We didn’t seek it out, but worked with the National Institutes
of Health and other government agencies to obtain this medication.”
Hence, we have the U.S. government saying both that delivery of the drug to
the aid workers was initially government’s idea, and that it wasn’t initially
government’s idea. Since both of these possibilities cannot be true, we
have our third U.S.
federal Ebola lie.
But whose idea was it, really, to deliver the ZMapp magic serum (which
is
said to have begun reversing Brantly’s condition within 20 minutes to an
hour)? In all likelihood it was the U.S. government’s idea, at a
minimum for the following reason mentioned in the Morning Consult article:
If [Mapp] did this on their own, they must have had unbelievable confidence
in the product and lawyers who know this up and down,” Vox said. “If they went
this alone, their investors should be worried, because that’s reckless. A team
of scientists could get in a lot of trouble doing that, and I can’t imagine
they run their company that way, especially considering they have support from
the Department of Defense.
Let’s put all of the above together and move toward wrapping matters up.We
have what appears to be the most contagious variant of Ebola ever encountered,
its genetic form is novel in important respects, and we still have no idea how
it arose in West Africa.
Yet, we are told that an experimental drug, ZMapp—produced by a previously
unheard of U.S.
firm with U.S. Department of Defense ties—is functioning in miraculous
fashion. Furthermore, the U.S.
government cannot keep its story straight about who initiated the delivery of
the experimental drug to the U.S.
aid workers, but there are compelling reasons to suppose it was the U.S.
government that engineered the delivery.
All of the foregoing should prompt us to ask: When was Mapp Pharmaceutical’s
magic drug ZMappdeveloped?
The following language, drawn from an
article
at International Business Times, might provide guidance:
A statement from Mapp said:
“ZMapp is the result of a collaboration between Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc,
LeafBio, DefyrusInc, the US
government and Public Health Agency of Canada.
“ZMapp is composed of three ‘humanised’ monoclonal antibodies manufactured
in plants, specifically Nicotiana. It is an optimised cocktail combining the
best components of MB-003 and ZMAb.
“ZMapp was first identified as a drug candidate in January 2014 and has not
yet been evaluated for safety in humans. As such, very little of the
drug is currently available. Any decision to use an experimental drug
in a patient would be a decision made by the treating physician under
the regulatory guidelines of the FDA.
One very interesting thing to note is the parties involved in producing
ZMapp. Two of the parties are the U.S. government and the Public Health
Agency of Canada—and the Public Health Agency of Canada, you will recall, is
the very same agency that “strongly suspects” that Ebola might be airborne (see
the second paragraph of this article). Yet, we are constantly told the U.S.
government suspects no such thing.
But there are even more important things to consider.
Does “ZMapp was first identified as a drug candidate in January 2014” mean
that ZMappwas designed from the ground up, pretty much when the outbreak began,
with the specific purpose of treating the Guinea Ebola variant (see above for
timing of the outbreak)? Or, does it mean that ZMapp was repurposed in
some way to grapple with the Guinea
variant? Or does it perhaps mean something else entirely?
In any event, if the above MappPharmaceuticals statement is true, this much
is perfectly clear: a major decision about ZMapp and its potential efficacy was
made in January 2014, and that decision appears to have been made very close on
the heels of the beginning of the current Guinea Ebola outbreak.
Therefore, if ZMapp really is the miraculous success
it
is purported to be, we are given to believe that, in Research and
Development terms, results must have been achieved virtually overnight.
This is because with the beginning of the outbreak of the brand
newGuinea Ebola variant dated to around December 2013, Mapp could not possibly
have had much time before its January 2014 decision to target the Guinea Ebola
variant with ZMapp.
Or might Mappin fact have had plenty of time?
One possibility is that Mappdid have plenty of time, because it knew about
the brand new Ebola variant before its debut appearance in West
Africa. This would be very strong evidence of a bioterror
conspiracy, would it not? Of course, we are very far from sure about this
prospect.
However, even if we are to believe that Mapp did not know about the novel
Guinea Ebola variant before that variant’s first appearance, but did in fact
advance anyway with ZMapp againstthe Guinea variant in January 2014, wemust
still ask exactly how ZM appended up being effective against a brand new
variant Mapp would, under the present assumption, have only just
encountered.
Perhaps Mapp had been in the process of designing ZMapp so that it could
successfully attack already extant Ebola variants, and whatever properties made
it effective against those already extant variants also transferred to the
novel Guinea
variant?
Maybe.
But if that is so, ZMapp should prove successful against variants of Ebola
other than the Guinea
variant. Will it?
If it doesn’t prove successful against variants of Ebola other than the Guinea variant, I do not see how one can
logically avoid the conclusion that the West African rooted, Guinea variant of Ebola amounts to U.S.
government linked bioterror.
Unless, of course, one is willing to invoke what amounts to a miraculous
stroke of luck consisting in the design of a solution that successfully attacks
something that’s never been seen before and was not anticipated—even though the
solution fails against related versions of the same problem.
In closing, please note that the U.S.
act of bioterror explanation economically accounts for all three U.S.
lies discussed in the article. It explains why the U.S. government is
lying about the airborne status of Ebola, why the U.S. government/MSM hybrid is
in no hurry to disclose the geographical and virological novelties of the
Guinea variant, and, finally, why the U.S. government, out of one side of its
mouth, wants to act like its “miracle experimental drug” had to be pried out of
its greedy and comprehensive regulatory hands.
It must be stated, though, that there is one last possibility after all,
which is that the Dr. Kent Brantly miracle recovery is no real recovery at all.
Dr. Jason Kissner is Associate Professor of
Criminology at California
State University. Dr.
Kissner’s research on gangs and self-control has appeared in academic
journals. His current empirical research interests include active
shootings. You can reach him atcrimprof2010@hotmail.com.
Liberian Minister Allowed Ebola-Infected American to Travel to Africa’s Largest City. Fuels Belief Outbreak is a
“Government Conspiracy”
Why Was Ebola-Infected Patrick Sawyer Cleared for Travel?
Global Research, August 17, 2014
And why aren’t any media outlets outside of Africa
talking about it?
Another scandal surrounding Ebola has exploded in Africa.
As reported in African media, such as
DailyPost Nigeria,
Sahara Reporters, and
All Africa (but nowhere I’ve found in the American
mainstream media), it has now come out the Liberian government likely knew that
Patrick Sawyer was infected with the Ebola virus
but cleared him for
travel anyway.
If you recall, Patrick Sawyer is the Liberian-American
consultant with the Liberian Ministry of Finance who was en route to Lagos,
Nigeria when he collapsed at the Lagos airport — Lagos being the largest city
in Africa. Sawyer was on his way to a work conference. He is the first American
to have died of Ebola, and as was widely reported stateside, he was planning a
trip to Minnesota where his wife and children
reside after he concluded business in Nigeria.
If Sawyer had made it stateside, he would have brought the disease with him.
Well, now it has come out that Deputy Finance Minister of Liberia Sebastian
Omar approved Sawyer’s travel despite knowledge Sawyer was probably infected
with Ebola.
Omar has stated that Sawyer was his friend, so he could not have stopped him
from traveling, and he has said he owes no apology for potentially putting
millions of lives at risk.
Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan has publicly denounced Sawyer as “a mad
man,” but perhaps his statement is misplaced; perhaps it should have gone to
Omar.
When questioned by the people on giving travel approval, Omar responded
angrily and with no apologies (via
DailyPost Nigeria):
“This does not excuse you from asking the questions as a government official
that would safeguard the lives of our citizens and your international partners.
It is your duty, again as a Government official not wanting to go above and
beyond his duty to safeguard our population,” another fan blasted.
Apparently angered by his comment, Omar replied, “I do not owe you any
explanation. POS (Patrick Sawyer) was a Public Health Practitioner if you must
know. The Ugandan doctor was a medical doctor if you again must know. They are
no more. So the freaking issue is not why he lied or didn’t lie to travel, but
how we address the freaking disease.
“If you don’t have jack to say in that direction then frankly shut up on the
subject. Sebastian Muah doesn’t have time today frankly for your rants” a
visibly angry Omar said.
Another fan identified as Omar Tariq said, “oh, hell yes you do owe
Liberians and the International Community an explanation, Sebastian Muah. This
is the complete arrogance of you people in government.
“How do you tell us such nonsense. You have through your negligence of not
asking the proper questions exposed others to such a horrible Virus and you on
here talking bull. A friend is dead, I am sorry but you have some answering to
do since you want to brag that you approved his travels.”
In his reply, Omar said, “the old people say empty drum makes the loudest
noise. So you will be talking by yourself, as I see you don’t know what you are
talking about and as a matter of finding solution, you do not have any but
trying to find blame. Someone must have frustrated the hell out of you in Liberia…
Take me to the International Court
since I am guilty of approving a travel.”
Interesting that while all of the mainstream media outlets here were quick
to tell everyone Sawyer was “just one plane ride away” from bringing Ebola home
to the United States, none of them are talking about how a man knowingly
infected with Ebola was approved to leave the country by his superior to
potentially do so in the first place.
Sawyer was the first case of Ebola to show up in Nigeria. There was no Ebola there
until Sawyer brought it there. The
nurse who treated Sawyer briefly after he collapsed in
Lagos has since
died from the disease.
If anything, this just adds fuel to the fire than many West Africans believe
the Ebola outbreak is a
government conspiracy.
Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and
analyst for The
Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared, and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with
Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The
Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with
Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food
self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
(Photo: Saddleback Church/Scott Tokar)
