Google+ Followers

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

Ugandans need a law that bans GMOs, not one that promotes them



 MPs and members of Food Right Alliance during the meeting at Hotel Africana in Kampala on Tuesday. PHOTO BY STEPHEN WANDERA  

ALSO READ:

When Americans bowed down and corporations led them in a prayer: The day California's Proposition 37 was defeated: Shock as Prop. 37: Genetic food labels defeated


 

Ugandans need a law that bans GMOs, not one that promotes them

http://www.monitor.co.ug/OpEd/Commentary/Ugandans-need-a-law-that-bans-GMOs--not-one-that-promotes-them/-/689364/1723078/-/xrujouz/-/index.html?fb_action_ids=10151559223999328&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582

By Ellady Muyambi

Posted  Monday, March 18  2013 at  02:00

In Summary
Why is the Bill neglecting the role of the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries? Uganda clearly has a comparative and competitive advantage in organic agriculture. In the current form, this Bill will hamstring Uganda’s competitiveness and kill jobs.

I was compelled to write this article after learning that the government passed the National Biotechnology and Biosafety Policy in 2008 and is now in advanced stages of passing the Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 commonly known as the GMO law, specifically to promote Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in Uganda.

The Bill was at first presented by Mr Denis Hamson Obua, Member of Parliament for Ajuri County and the Chairperson for the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology as a Private Members Bill.

It was, however, later taken on by the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development and approved by Cabinet in October, 2012. It was read in Parliament for the first time on February 6, where it was referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, which has been given only 45 days to report back. The Committee is collecting public views and is left with less than 10 days to make a report.

Vital aspects of GMOs include the hyper use of the pesticide glyphosate sold under trade name Roundup, which is not only too toxic to crops but also to human health and other environmental specimens as well as loss of indigenous seeds. This Bill is, therefore, contentious because, in its current form, will pave way for mass introduction of GMOs in Uganda – under the pretext of saving Uganda from food insecurity!

For instance, Part 1 Clause 2(b)- Page 4 of the draft Bill, makes it very clear that the objective is to facilitate and promote GMOs in Uganda. Part 111 Clause 25(a)- Page 21 of the draft Bill states that a GMO can be freely accepted in Uganda so long as it has been accepted in another country. To put it into bluntly, with the passing and implementation of this Bill, those who enjoy local chicken and other traditional African dishes will soon forget them.

Also, Part 111 Clause 25(d) - Page 22 makes says a GMO can quickly and easily be allowed in Uganda if the competent authority (in this case, the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST), which was established automatically : Part 11 Clause 6) believes that there is an emergency.

This is ridiculous! Everyone knows the position of UNCST on GMOs. It is a direct promoter of GMOs. It is, therefore, impossible for it to regulate them when it wants them in the country.

There are so many other overlapping functions in the draft Bill. For instance, Part 11 Clause 4 talks of the National Focal Point of GMO issues in the country. How can this be the Ministry of Water and Environment? Why is the Bill neglecting the role of the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries?

Uganda clearly has a comparative and competitive advantage in organic agriculture. In the current form, this Bill will hamstring Uganda’s competitiveness and kill jobs. The Bill has not been given much public consultation and yet Article 1 of the Cartagena Protocol to which Uganda is a signatory, demands that the public must debate thoroughly and agree on the introduction of GMOs in a country. It is, therefore, important to have more public debate on the competent authority to deal with these issues.

Mr Muyambi is the secretary general for Uganda Network on Toxic Free Malaria Control and the Executive Director for Historic Resources Conservation Initiatives. elladmuyambi@yahoo.com

Expert warns MPs against law on GMOs

http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/Expert-warns-MPs-against-law-on-GMOs/-/688334/1726070/-/5g259uz/-/index.html

By  Stephen Wandera

Posted  Thursday, March 21  2013 at  02:00

Uganda risks compromising the health of its citizens and the environment if Parliament enacts the bio-safety and biotechnology Bill in its present form, a Kenyan specialist on Genetically Modified Organisms/seeds (GMOs) has said.

Uganda is among countries that are quickly adopting the technology with field trials for banana, maize, cotton, potatoes and rice at Namulonge and Kawanda Research Institutes.

If enacted, the law will guide the introduction and commercial production of GMOs in the country. Analysts say foreign multi-national companies would take advantage of the situation to flood the local market and suffocate local farmers.

“Uganda should not fall in a trap like Kenya did. You (MPs) should ensure that government funds sustainable agriculture and slow down on passing this Bill,” said Dr Daniel Maingi, the director Kenya Biodiversity Network in Kampala on Tuesday.

Dr Maingi said Uganda should emulate Tanzania’s regulatory framework on GMOs that has a liability clause that protects its citizens.


He said Africa lacks safety data on genetically modified foods and condemned the patenting of life and the privatisation of agriculture that is threatening to dispossess African food producers of control over their production systems.

However, Dr Maingi’s call was received with mixed reactions by MPs on how to proceed with the Bill that is expected to be tabled soon.

Maracha Woman MP Lematia Ondoru expressed disappointment that the Bill is before Parliament.

“In USA, organic food is very expensive. You have to travel miles to get organic food. This Bill is not ours, it should be thrown out.”

Mpigi Woman MP Sarah Nakawunde and Gomba Woman MP Kyabangi Nakato said the Bill should be dropped and government invests money in research for indigenous crops.

However, Kyadondo North MP Kasule Sebunya said GMOs can only be fought from the laboratory.

“The people I represent in Kawanda and Namulonge have spent more than 20 years researching. As Parliament, we have to find a way to help our people,” he said.

Kasese Woman MP Winnie Kizza called for more debate to educate legislators and farmers to make informed decisions.
“We should not just trash the Bill but give people time to interact and learn more.”