Ugandans Reject Museveni’s Apology, Demand Real Reform Ahead of 2026 Elections
http://examiner.co.ug/news/national/ugandans-reject-musevenis-apology-demand-real-reform-ahead-of-2026-elections/
A recent public apology by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and First Lady Janet Museveni has sparked widespread criticism, with many citizens dismissing it as political theatrics lacking genuine intent or meaningful change. The apology was made during a national prayer event led by their daughter, Pastor Patience Rwabwogo, where the couple asked forgiveness for past mistakes made by themselves and their government representatives.
Instead of placating public frustration, the move drew skepticism, especially from the country’s youth and opposition voices. Social media platforms buzzed with doubts about the sincerity of the gesture. Ugandan citizen Martin Kabagambi voiced a common sentiment, stating that prayer alone won’t address the country’s deep-rooted issues. Others questioned the timing and motivation behind the apology, particularly given the lack of promised reforms.
Businessman Rasuli Rugwire Njuba criticized the state of Uganda’s governance, listing a litany of issues including corruption, unemployment, poor infrastructure, and the absence of rule of law. Similarly, researcher Stinaj Naava suggested that a meaningful gesture would involve restoring the constitution to its original form and limiting presidential powers, especially in judicial appointments.
Some called for the release of political prisoners and for Museveni to step down voluntarily. Online commentator @Yasin762698 claimed that forgiveness might be possible if the president resigned and freed those unjustly detained. The apology was perceived by analysts as a strategic move to win favor in Buganda, a key political region long disenchanted with the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM).
Many young Ugandans, who have known no other leader during Museveni’s nearly four-decade rule, are growing increasingly critical, likening his governance to the authoritarian regimes he once opposed. Voices like Victoria Katabazi and Francis Kakeeto stressed that real forgiveness must follow actual reforms—ending political persecution and redirecting national resources for public benefit.
Though the Musevenis acknowledged negligence and lack of diligence in their Sunday address, they did not present any specific policy changes or discuss succession plans. The absence of Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Museveni’s son and a controversial military figure, was also noted and raised further doubts about the authenticity of the repentance.
Reactions ranged from spiritual support to harsh critique. While some praised the humility shown, others dismissed it as manipulative. Dr. Catherine Kyobutungi labeled it hypocritical, noting that political prisoners still languish under dubious charges. Paul Mugumya sarcastically remarked that the apology might have been more believable if it wasn’t made in an election season, hinting at possible ulterior motives.
Opposition figure Robert Kyagulanyi, also known as Bobi Wine, outright rejected the apology. Speaking in Gulu City, he accused the government of ongoing human rights abuses and land grabs. He emphasized that a genuine apology must be backed by a halt to oppression, stating that no dialogue can occur while citizens remain victims of state violence.
Public commentary continued online, with some users suggesting that the event was orchestrated more for divine absolution than public accountability. Others questioned whether the Museveni family was ready to make amends to regions like Buganda, which have suffered significantly under their administration.
As the country heads toward the 2026 general elections, Museveni’s gesture appears to have done little to rebuild trust. Critics argue that true reconciliation will only come with real systemic change, not symbolic acts or spiritual appeals. For many Ugandans, the apology was not a turning point but a reminder of unresolved injustices that still define the nation’s political landscape.